 |

Executive KnowledgeWorks
Consulting: Leveraging Executive Education and Leader Development For Strategic
Planning, Action Learning, Customized Executive Education and Enhanced
Business Meetings - all supported by a philosophy of Breakthrough Centered Development.
Research and Publishing:
Eight National Benchmarking Reports.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |

Pros and Cons
Thank you for making time to visit our site. While the information contained in each of the sections of
this Web site provides, in the aggregate, a more detailed exploration of the strengths and weaknesses of various
approaches to executive development, leadership development and organization development, this section is meant
to offer a quick overview.
We've organized our thinking regarding approaches to "Development" around three of the most
prevalent processes:
- Action Learning
- Executive Education
- Executive Coaching.
Action Learning:
Action Learning - Pros
- Probably the most POWERFUL single approach to individual and organization development.
- When properly designed - very ENGAGING even for the most seasoned and cynical of senior executives.
- When successful, there is a substantive, relatively near-term BUSINESS PAYOFF.
- May very well provide the HIGHEST ROI of all the development processes.
- The locus of RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCCESS quickly shifts to and normally stays with the participants.
Action Learning - Cons
- Normally, a HIGHER COST per participant-day than other development modalities.
- Even when well designed (perhaps especially when well designed) can feel OUT OF CONTROL to the HRD staff and senior management.
- Because of its real-time nature, Action Learning can sometimes be a difficult modality in which to insure INDIVIDUALIZED DEVELOPMENT.
- If not properly designed, facilitated and managed, an Action Learning initiative can put senior management in a NO WIN situation.
- Can be demanding and RESOURCE INTENSE.
Traditional Executive Education:
Traditional Executive Education - Pros
- Traditional executive education interventions are normally easier for senior management and the HRD design team to CONTROL.
- When compared to Action Learning initiatives, Traditional Executive Education activities are typically LESS COSTLY per person-day.
- Because their goals are typically less ambitious than those of Action Learning initiatives, Traditional Executive Education programs are normally LESS RISKY.
- Unless it's design is highly unconventional and untested, a Traditional Executive Education initiative will normally leave a senior
management team that is looking for stability and predictability feeling MORE COMFORTABLE than would an Action Learning initiative.
- When creatively and properly designed, a Traditional Executive Education program can have POWERFUL individual and/or organization DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT.
Traditional Executive Education - Cons
- The locus of RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCCESS starts with and often stays with the design staff. Participants may have the unproductive luxury of remaining consumers and critics.
- A Traditional Executive Education program, if poorly conceptualized or designed can be (justifiably) PERCEIVED AS WEAK, irrelevant and/or academic.
- It may, therefore (if poorly designed), be LESS ENGAGING for the business-focused manager or executive.
- Because the goals of a Traditional Executive Education program are often less ambitious than those of an Action Learning initiative, the
BUSINESS PAYOFF(S) may be DELAYED, diluted or, in the worst cases, non-existent.
Executive Coaching:
Executive Coaching - Pros
- The development can be TARGETED and truly individualized.
- The initial and ongoing investments in Executive Coaching can be CONTROLLED and modest. See "Cons" also.
- At least for the individual, the IMPACT can be measurable, substantive and fairly immediate.
- It can be a DISCRETE and quiet intervention.
Executive Coaching - Cons
- Executive Coaching can be a CHALLENGE TO SYSTEMATIZE and/or scale up.
- Executive Coaching is sometimes used as a substitute or replacement for strong leadership and MANAGERIAL COURAGE.
- As organizations strive to achieve "scale" in their coaching efforts, it is easy to LOSE CONTROL of:
- The "message" and content
- Costs
- Quality
- Managers' and executives' expectations
To explore these and other strengths and issues related to each of the major human resource development
processes call or email us at 815 356 3557 / info@ekw-hrd.com
Back To Top
|
 |
 |